UNDER ARMOUR HeatGear Trainer Low-Cut Socks - 3-Pack

UNDER ARMOUR HeatGear Trainer Low-Cut Socks - 3-Pack - SportsAuthority.com
View Larger
Play Video
$14.99
Item # 30721876

Promotions

Eligible for Free Shipping, No Minimum! (see promotion details)
Members of The League get 5% back when you spend $100! (see promotion details)

1. Pick a Color Please choose a color

  • Black
  • White

2. Choose Your Size Size Chart » Please choose a size

  • M
  • L
  • XL

3. Choose a QuantityPlease choose a qty

Be sure to select a color, size and quantity

Availability

In stock: Leaves warehouse in 1 - 2 full bus. days
Details »
IN STORE: Available In Stores.

Product Details

Take excellent care of your feet so you can comfortably conquer your workout with these UNDER ARMOUR® Trainer low-cut socks! HeatGear® and Charged Cotton® fabrics combine to wick moisture away and accelerate evaporation to keep you dry. ArmourBlock® technology prevents the growth of odor-causing bacteria, and embedded arch support reduces foot fatigue.

Features



  • Black: 75% polyester, 24% cotton, 1% spandex
  • White: 61% polyester, 24% cotton, 14% nylon, 1% spandex
  • 3 pairs of low-cut socks
  • Unisex
  • HeatGear® and Charged Cotton® technologies wick moisture and accelerate evaporation
  • Embedded arch support reduces foot fatigue
  • ArmourBlock® prevents odor-causing bacteria
  • Made in Honduras

Product Recommendations

Product Reviews

REVIEW SNAPSHOT®

by PowerReviews
UNDER ARMOUR HeatGear Trainer Low-Cut Socks - 3-Pack
 
3.0

(based on 1 review)

Ratings Distribution

  • 5 Stars

     

    (0)

  • 4 Stars

     

    (0)

  • 3 Stars

     

    (1)

  • 2 Stars

     

    (0)

  • 1 Stars

     

    (0)

Reviewed by 1 customer

Displaying review 1

Back to top

 
3.0

Product runs big

By BMB

from Kennesaw, GA

Verified Buyer

Pros

    Cons

      Best Uses

        Comments about UNDER ARMOUR HeatGear Trainer Low-Cut Socks - 3-Pack:

        Product is good quality but the size runs big.

        • Sizing:
        • Feels too large

        Comment on this review

        Displaying review 1

        Back to top